0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.06	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.19/0.48	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.19/0.48	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.19/0.48	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.19/0.48	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.19/0.48	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.19/0.48	% CPULimit : 1440
0.19/0.48	% WCLimit  : 180
0.19/0.48	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:33:07 UTC 2026
0.19/0.48	% CPUTime  : 
0.19/0.48	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.23/0.54	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.23/0.55	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.20qRk1tUyH/E---3.1_1198288.p
0.23/0.59	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
0.23/0.59	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.23/0.59	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.23/0.59	% Starting new_ho_11 with 900s (5) cores
0.23/0.59	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.23/0.59	% Starting new_ho_9 with 180s (1) cores
0.23/0.59	% Starting ho_unfolding_4 with 180s (1) cores
0.23/0.59	% sh5l with pid 1198302 completed with status 0
0.23/0.59	% Result found by sh5l
0.23/0.59	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.23/0.59	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.23/0.59	% Starting new_ho_11 with 900s (5) cores
0.23/0.59	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.23/0.59	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.23/0.59	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.23/0.59	% Search class: HGHNF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN
0.23/0.59	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.23/0.59	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.23/0.59	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1198305 completed with status 0
0.23/0.59	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.23/0.59	% Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNSSN.
0.23/0.59	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.23/0.59	% Starting new_ho_11 with 900s (5) cores
0.23/0.59	% Starting sh5l with 180s (1) cores
0.23/0.59	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
0.23/0.59	% SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
0.23/0.59	% Search class: HGHNF-FFSM11-SSSFFSBN
0.23/0.59	% Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.23/0.59	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores
0.23/0.59	% Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.23/0.59	
0.23/0.59	% Proof found!
0.23/0.59	% SZS status Theorem
0.23/0.59	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_23, type, holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI: $i > $o > $o).
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_24, type, lAnna_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_26, type, lBill_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_27, type, lBob_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_29, type, lSue_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_30, type, lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI: $i > $i).
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_31, type, likes_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_32, type, n2009_THFTYPE_i: $i).
0.23/0.59	thf(decl_33, type, parent_THFTYPE_IiioI: $i > $i > $o).
0.23/0.59	thf(con, conjecture, ?[X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~((X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.20qRk1tUyH/E---3.1_1198288.p', con)).
0.23/0.59	thf(ax_004, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.20qRk1tUyH/E---3.1_1198288.p', ax_004)).
0.23/0.59	thf(ax_007, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.20qRk1tUyH/E---3.1_1198288.p', ax_007)).
0.23/0.59	thf(ax_002, axiom, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.20qRk1tUyH/E---3.1_1198288.p', ax_002)).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i, X3:$i]:((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ ((((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~((X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[con])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~(?[X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((~(((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)&~((X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)&~((X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_6, axiom, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_004])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X7:$i > $i > $o, X8:$i, X9:$i]:(((((~(X7 @ X8 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(X7 @ X8 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|(X7 @ X8 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))&((~(X7 @ X8 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))))&((~(X7 @ X8 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(X7 @ X9 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false)|~(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((~(likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:((~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true))))|~((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i]:(((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_13, axiom, ((~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_007])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_14, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))|~((likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_15, plain, (likes_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lBill_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_16, plain, ((~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_17, plain, (((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fool_unroll,[status(thm)],[ax_002])])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X3:$i, X2:$i]:(((X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))|~((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true)))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_19, plain, (holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (($true))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_20, plain, ((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_21, plain, (((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $true))&(~(parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|(holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ $false))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i > $i > $o, X2:$i, X3:$i]:(((X1 @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)|~((X1 @ X3 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19])])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_23, plain, (parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lSue_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_20, c_0_12])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_24, plain, ((holdsDuring_THFTYPE_IiooI @ (lYearFn_THFTYPE_IiiI @ n2009_THFTYPE_i) @ (~($true)))|~((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ lBob_THFTYPE_i @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, ![X2:$i]:((parent_THFTYPE_IiioI @ X2 @ lAnna_THFTYPE_i)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])).
0.23/0.59	thf(c_0_26, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])]), c_0_12]), ['proof']).
0.23/0.59	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.23/0.59	% Parsed axioms                        : 23
0.23/0.59	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 12
0.23/0.59	% Initial clauses                      : 26
0.23/0.59	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
0.23/0.59	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 24
0.23/0.59	% Processed clauses                    : 34
0.23/0.59	% ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.23/0.59	% ...subsumed                          : 0
0.23/0.59	% ...remaining for further processing  : 33
0.23/0.59	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.23/0.59	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.23/0.59	% Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.23/0.59	% Backward-rewritten                   : 13
0.23/0.59	% Generated clauses                    : 20
0.23/0.59	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 26
0.23/0.59	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.23/0.59	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.23/0.59	% Paramodulations                      : 13
0.23/0.59	% Factorizations                       : 0
0.23/0.59	% NegExts                              : 0
0.23/0.59	% Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.23/0.59	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.23/0.59	% Total rewrite steps                  : 13
0.23/0.59	% ...of those cached                   : 2
0.23/0.59	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.23/0.59	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.23/0.59	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.23/0.59	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.23/0.59	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.23/0.59	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.23/0.59	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.23/0.59	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.23/0.59	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.23/0.59	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.23/0.59	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.23/0.59	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.23/0.59	% Current number of processed clauses  : 11
0.23/0.59	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 7
0.23/0.59	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.23/0.59	%    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.23/0.59	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
0.23/0.59	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16
0.23/0.59	% ...number of literals in the above   : 26
0.23/0.59	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.23/0.59	% Current number of archived clauses   : 22
0.23/0.59	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 59
0.23/0.59	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 58
0.23/0.59	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.23/0.59	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
0.23/0.59	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.23/0.59	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 11
0.23/0.59	% BW rewrite match successes           : 11
0.23/0.59	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.23/0.59	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.23/0.59	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 1683
0.23/0.59	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 121
0.23/0.59	
0.23/0.59	% -------------------------------------------------
0.23/0.59	% User time                : 0.006 s
0.23/0.59	% System time              : 0.000 s
0.23/0.59	% Total time               : 0.006 s
0.23/0.59	% Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
0.23/0.59	
0.23/0.59	% -------------------------------------------------
0.23/0.59	% User time                : 0.008 s
0.23/0.59	% System time              : 0.004 s
0.23/0.59	% Total time               : 0.012 s
0.23/0.59	% Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
0.23/0.59	% E exiting
0.23/0.59	EOF